本文へ移動

論文 ·日本語 ·未確認

Munda languages are father tongues, but Japanese and Korean are not

Gyaneshwer Chaubey ・ George van Driem

刊行年
2020-01-01
収録
『Evolutionary Human Sciences』 2 pp. e19-e19
出版
Cambridge University Press
言語
英語
OpenAlex
W3029519654
DOI
10.1017/ehs.2020.14
PubMed
37588351
MAG
3029519654
ISSN
2513-843X
URL
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/9F302F4A80E691B05F424312CA03BCDE/S2513843X20000146a.pdf/div-class-title-munda-languages-are-father-tongues-but-japanese-and-korean-are-not-div.pdf

要旨

Over two decades ago, it was observed that the linguistic affinity of the language spoken by a particular population tended to correlate with the predominant paternal, i.e. Y-chromosomal, lineage found in that population. Such correlations were found to be ubiquitous but not universal, and the striking exceptions to such conspicuous patterns of correlation between linguistic and genetic phylogeography elicit particular interest and beg for clarification. Within the Austroasiatic language family, the Munda languages are a clear-cut case of father tongues, whereas Japanese and Korean are manifestly not. In this study, the cases of Munda and Japanese are juxtaposed. A holistic understanding of these contrasting cases of ethnolinguistic prehistory with respect to the father tongue correlation will first necessitate a brief exposition of the phylogeography of the Y chromosomal lineage O. Then triangulation discloses some contours and particulars of both long lost episodes of ethnolinguistic prehistory.

主題

この書誌の出所

  • openalex— W3029519654(2026-08-13取得)

引用

Gyaneshwer Chaubey・George van Driem(2020-01-01) Munda languages are father tongues, but Japanese and Korean are not 『Evolutionary Human Sciences』 2 pp. e19-e19 Cambridge University Press

ChaubeyDriem2020MundaLanguagesAre
書誌 67,320件 語別索引 17,251件 資源 113件 研究者 303名 JSON