本文へ移動

論文 ·用例に日本語 ·未確認

The ingredients of comparison: The semantics of the excessive construction in Japanese

Xiao Li

刊行年
2015-05-12
収録
『Semantics and Pragmatics』 8
出版
Linguistic Society of America
言語
英語
OpenAlex
W1479888801
DOI
10.3765/sp.8.8
MAG
1479888801
ISSN
1937-8912
URL
https://semprag.org/index.php/sp/article/download/sp.8.8/pdf_8_8

要旨

Excessives (e.g., this pair of pants is too long) are often considered as a ‘degree construction’ in the literature, presumably because it is assumed that their semantics involves a comparison of degrees. This paper takes a cross-linguistic look at the excessive construction in Japanese and raises the question of whether degrees are a necessary ingredient in the semantics of comparison. Unlike any degree morpheme in English, -sugi ‘to exceed’ can combine with either a gradable adjective (e.g., naga ‘long’) or a non-gradable verb (e.g., yomi ‘to read’) to form an excessive construction. In each case, a semantically different type of phrase can be used as a differential: when -sugi combines with an adjective, a measure phrase can be used as a differential; when -sugi combines with a verb, a floating numeral quantifier can be used as a differential. Based on this observation, I put forward a non-degree based analysis in which -sugi is not a degree quantifier. Specifically, I argue that a V-sugi sentence describes a comparison of two sets of objects or events, whereas an Adj-sugi sentence describes a comparison of two sets of degrees. This analysis draws an interesting parallel to the A-not-A analysis of the comparative in the literature, and implies that the semantics of a ‘degree construction’ does not necessarily involve a comparison of degrees. http://dx.doi.org/10.3765/sp.8.8 BibTeX info

主題

この書誌の出所

  • openalex— W1479888801(2026-08-14取得)

引用

Xiao Li(2015-05-12) The ingredients of comparison: The semantics of the excessive construction in Japanese 『Semantics and Pragmatics』 8 Linguistic Society of America

Li2015IngredientsComparison
書誌 67,320件 語別索引 17,251件 資源 113件 研究者 303名 JSON