論文 ·日本語 ·未確認
A Comparative Analysis of Semi-direct Speaking Testing and Direct Speaking Testing for Japanese EFL Learners
- 刊行年
- 2016
- 収録
- 『International Journal of Curriculum Development and Practice』 18(1) pp. 27-38
- 出版
- 日本教科教育学会
- crid
- 1390282680759111808
- ndl_bib_id
- 027558764
- uri
- http://id.ndl.go.jp/bib/027558764
- naid
- 130005296137
- issn
- 13444808
- doi
- 10.18993/jcrdaen.18.1_27
- URL
- https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1390282680759111808
要旨
Although speaking tests have become more important in Japan over the past decades with the recent emphasis on communicative language teaching, they remain infrequent at most schools. This is because assessing speaking skills is quite difficult in terms of its practicality. However, since MEXT (2014b) announced that students’ English proficiency and learning status in terms of the four language skills will be assessed and analyzed even in entrance examination in the near future, speaking test development can be on urgent business. There are two main types of test formats to assess speaking skills so far: a semi-direct, or person-to-machine, test, and a direct, or face-to-face, test. This study investigated whether the speaking ability measures would make a difference depending on two testing formats. The results showed there was no statistically significant difference between two test formats. However, according to questionnaire results, test takers preferred direct testing to semi-direct testing.
主題
この書誌の出所
- cinii— 1390282680759111808(2026-08-13取得)
引用キー: Michi2016ComparativeAnalysisSemi