本文へ移動

論文 ·日本語 ·未確認

The effect of ingroup-outgroup comparison context on black sheep effect. An analysis from a social identity perspective.

Chitose Oishi ・ Fujio Yoshida

刊行年
2001-01-01
収録
『The Japanese journal of psychology』 71(6) pp. 445-453
出版
The Japanese Psychological Association
言語
英語
OpenAlex
W2323324745
DOI
10.4992/jjpsy.71.445
MAG
2323324745
ISSN
0021-5236
URL
https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jjpsy1926/71/6/71_6_445/_pdf

要旨

Based on social identity theory (Tajfel, 1978), it is expected that black sheep effect occurs only in cases where ingroup members are compared with outgroup individuals. In study 1, 112 female student nurses were divided into two groups, and evaluated both outgroup and ingroup individuals (outgroup-ingroup condition), or ingroup members only (ingroup-only condition). Black sheep effect was found only in the outgroup-ingroup condition. Ingroup members in the condition were evaluated more extremely than those in the ingroup-only condition, and there was no significant difference between the evaluations of outgroup individuals in the outgroup-ingroup condition and ingroup members in the ingroup-only condition. The results confirmed the ingroup-outgroup comparison prediction. In study 2, in addition to rating four individuals, desirable or undesirable and ingroup or outgroup, 86 female student nurses were asked to indicate the importance of their own social identity. Mack sheep effect was observed, with perception of ingroup homogeneity strengthening ingroup identification, thereby facilitating black sheep effect. These findings support Turners self categorization theory (1982) as an explanation of the mechanism for black sheep effect.

主題

この書誌の出所

  • openalex— W2323324745(2026-08-14取得)

引用

Chitose Oishi・Fujio Yoshida(2001-01-01) The effect of ingroup-outgroup comparison context on black sheep effect. An analysis from a social identity perspective. 『The Japanese journal of psychology』 71(6) pp. 445-453 The Japanese Psychological Association

OishiYoshida2001EffectIngroupOutgroup
書誌 67,320件 語別索引 17,251件 資源 113件 研究者 303名 JSON