論文 ·日本語 ·未確認
Estimation of sink capacity of rice grains: A comparison of calculation methods based on 1000-grain weight and grain projected area
Masaki Okamura ・ Ryutaro Morita ・ Yumiko Arai‐Sanoh ・ Hiroe Yoshida ・ Hiroshi Nakagawa ・ Naohiro Aoki
- 刊行年
- 2023-06-27
- 収録
- 『Plant Production Science』 26(3) pp. 236-248
- 出版
- Taylor & Francis
- 言語
- 英語
- OpenAlex
- W4382459094
- DOI
- 10.1080/1343943x.2023.2228500
- ISSN
- 1343-943X
- URL
- https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/1343943X.2023.2228500?needAccess=true&role=button
要旨
Accurate estimation of sink capacity in rice (grain number × potential grain size), independent of grain filling, is necessary for considering source – sink interactions. However, how to measure potential grain size is still a matter of debate. Here, we investigated the effect of modifying the grain-filling environment on 1000-grain weight of grains screened by specific gravity or brown rice thickness, grain projected area (‘grain area’), or husk weight as candidate indicators of potential grain size using a japonica cultivar Koshihikari and its near-isogenic line with greater spikelet number. We found grain area to be the best, followed by 1000-grain weight. We developed a novel method to calculate sink capacity from grain area; the method was developed based on the relationship between individual grain weight and grain area. Comparison with the conventional method based on 1000-grain weight showed that although the method based on grain area is more accurate, that based on 1000-grain weight is useful enough, because screening by specific gravity or brown rice thickness selected filled grains well, and the effect of the grain-filling environment on 1000-grain weight was limited.
主題
この書誌の出所
- openalex— W4382459094(2026-08-14取得)
引用
Masaki Okamura・Ryutaro Morita・Yumiko Arai‐Sanoh・Hiroe Yoshida・Hiroshi Nakagawa・Naohiro Aoki(2023-06-27) Estimation of sink capacity of rice grains: A comparison of calculation methods based on 1000-grain weight and grain projected area 『Plant Production Science』 26(3) pp. 236-248 Taylor & Francis