論文 ·日本語 ·未確認
Assessment of permanent brachytherapy combined with androgen deprivation therapy in an intermediate‐risk prostate cancer group without a Gleason score of 4 + 3: A single Japanese institutional experience
Koji Okihara ・ Kana Kobayashi ・ Tsuyoshi Iwata ・ Yasuyuki Naitoh ・ Kazumi Kamoi ・ Akihiro Kawauchi ・ Kei Yamada ・ Tsuneharu Miki
- 刊行年
- 2013-08-22
- 収録
- 『International Journal of Urology』 21(3) pp. 271-276
- 出版
- Wiley
- 言語
- 英語
- OpenAlex
- W2153991670
- DOI
- 10.1111/iju.12245
- PubMed
- 24033545
- MAG
- 2153991670
- ISSN
- 0919-8172
- URL
- https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.12245
要旨
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the outcome of low-dose-rate permanent brachytherapy combined with anti-androgen deprivation therapy for intermediate-risk prostate cancer excluding biopsy Gleason score 4 + 3. METHODS: Patients included in the intermediate-risk group were those presenting clinical stage T1c to T2c (by magnetic resonance imaging staging), Gleason score 3 + 4 or lower and/or prostate-specific antigen less than 20 ng/mL, whereas those with clinical stage T1c to T2a, Gleason score 3 + 3 and prostate-specific antigen less than 10 ng/mL represented the low-risk group, and were used as controls. In the intermediate-risk group, therapy with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog was continued for at least 6 months before and after permanent brachytherapy. RESULTS: A total of 147 low-risk group patients and 139 intermediate-risk group patients were included in the study. The median follow up was 51 and 52 months for the intermediate-risk group and low-risk group, respectively. The 5-year overall, cause-specific and distant-metastasis-free survival rates in the low-risk group and intermediate-risk group were 97.6/99.2, 100/100 and 100/100%, respectively. The 5-year biochemical disease-free survival in these groups were 95.9 and 92.5%, respectively (P = 0.18). There was no sexual activity and desire for erection before treatment in 50%, and in 46% of the patients in the low-risk group and intermediate-risk group, respectively. Overall satisfaction score at 2 years after permanent brachytherapy significantly improved, compared with pretreatment (P = 0.0399). CONCLUSIONS: In intermediate-risk prostate cancer, excluding biopsy Gleason score 4 + 3, permanent brachytherapy combined with androgen deprivation therapy for 6 months or more represents an effective treatment option in Japanese patients, based on a favorable prognosis, adverse event profile and quality of life analysis.
主題
この書誌の出所
- openalex— W2153991670(2026-08-14取得)
引用
Koji Okihara・Kana Kobayashi・Tsuyoshi Iwata・Yasuyuki Naitoh・Kazumi Kamoi・Akihiro Kawauchi・Kei Yamada・Tsuneharu Miki(2013-08-22) Assessment of permanent brachytherapy combined with androgen deprivation therapy in an intermediate‐risk prostate cancer group without a Gleason score of 4 + 3: A single Japanese institutional experience 『International Journal of Urology』 21(3) pp. 271-276 Wiley