本文へ移動

論文 ·日本語 ·未確認

The cross-script length effect: Further evidence challenging PDP models of reading aloud.

Kathleen Rastle J Havelka Taeko N. Wydell Max Coltheart Derek Besner

刊行年
2009-01-01
収録
『Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition』 35(1) pp. 238-246
出版
American Psychological Association
言語
英語
OpenAlex
W2158602867
DOI
10.1037/a0014361
PubMed
19210093
MAG
2158602867
ISSN
0278-7393
URL
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014361

要旨

The interaction between length and lexical status is one of the key findings used in support of models of reading aloud that postulate a serial process in the orthography-to-phonology translation (B. S. Weekes, 1997). However, proponents of parallel models argue that this effect arises in peripheral visual or articulatory processes. The authors addressed this possibility using the special characteristics of the Serbian and Japanese writing systems. Experiment 1 examined length effects in Serbian when participants were biased to interpret phonologically bivalent stimuli in the alphabet in which they are words or in the alphabet in which they are nonwords (i.e., the visual characteristics of stimuli were held constant across lexical status). Experiment 2 examined length effects in Japanese kana when words were presented in the kana script in which they usually appear or in the script in which they do not normally appear (i.e., the phonological characteristics of stimuli were held constant across lexical status). Results in both cases showed a larger length effect when stimuli were treated as nonwords and thus offered strong support to models of reading aloud that postulate a serial component.

主題

この書誌の出所

  • openalex— W2158602867(2026-08-14取得)

引用

Kathleen Rastle・J Havelka・Taeko N. Wydell・Max Coltheart・Derek Besner(2009-01-01) The cross-script length effect: Further evidence challenging PDP models of reading aloud. 『Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition』 35(1) pp. 238-246 American Psychological Association

Rastle2009CrossScriptLength
書誌 67,320件 語別索引 17,251件 資源 113件 研究者 303名 JSON