論文 ·日本語 ·未確認
Against verb-stranding VP-ellipsis in Japanese: reply to Funakoshi (2016)
- 刊行年
- 2023-02-24
- 収録
- 『Journal of East Asian Linguistics』 32(1) pp. 1-28
- 出版
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- 言語
- 日本語
- crid
- 1050859073008837760
- uri
- https://ousar.lib.okayama-u.ac.jp/65227
- issn
- 0925-8558
- doi
- 10.1007/s10831-022-09250-6
- ndl_bib
- R100000136-I1050859073008837760
- URL
- https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1050859073008837760
要旨
Japanese has a deletion operation, called argument ellipsis, that targets arguments (Oku in A theory of selection and reconstruction in the minimalist program, 1998). The operation does not apply to adjuncts, and thus, adjuncts are unelidable. Funakoshi (J East Asian Linguist 25(2):113–42, 2016), following in the footsteps of Otani and Whitman (Linguist Inquiry 22:345–58, 1991), argues that adjuncts can be elided when V-stranding VP-deletion applies. This article refutes Funakoshi’s proposal. Under rigorous control, adjuncts are generally unelidable even when the context strongly favors the adjunct inclusive interpretation, showing that the language lacks VP-deletion. It is also shown that, for a small number of speakers who permit the adjunct inclusive interpretation, the interpretation is sensitive to island constraints. The observation is attributed to covert right dislocation (Tanaka in J Linguist 37:551–79, 2001), marginally available for such speakers.
主題
この書誌の出所
- cinii— 1050859073008837760(2026-08-13取得)
- ndl— R100000136-I1050859073008837760(2026-08-13取得)
引用キー: Tanaka2023AgainstVerbStranding