本文へ移動

論文 ·日本語 ·未確認

Against verb-stranding VP-ellipsis in Japanese: reply to Funakoshi (2016)

Tanaka, Hidekazu ・ Hidekazu Tanaka

刊行年
2023-02-24
収録
『Journal of East Asian Linguistics』 32(1) pp. 1-28
出版
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
言語
日本語・英語
CiNii CRID
1050859073008837760
URI
https://ousar.lib.okayama-u.ac.jp/65227
ISSN
0925-8558
DOI
10.1007/s10831-022-09250-6
NDL書誌ID
R100000136-I1050859073008837760
OpenAlex
W4321788251
URL
https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1050859073008837760

要旨

Japanese has a deletion operation, called argument ellipsis, that targets arguments (Oku in A theory of selection and reconstruction in the minimalist program, 1998). The operation does not apply to adjuncts, and thus, adjuncts are unelidable. Funakoshi (J East Asian Linguist 25(2):113–42, 2016), following in the footsteps of Otani and Whitman (Linguist Inquiry 22:345–58, 1991), argues that adjuncts can be elided when V-stranding VP-deletion applies. This article refutes Funakoshi’s proposal. Under rigorous control, adjuncts are generally unelidable even when the context strongly favors the adjunct inclusive interpretation, showing that the language lacks VP-deletion. It is also shown that, for a small number of speakers who permit the adjunct inclusive interpretation, the interpretation is sensitive to island constraints. The observation is attributed to covert right dislocation (Tanaka in J Linguist 37:551–79, 2001), marginally available for such speakers.

主題

この書誌の出所

  • cinii— 1050859073008837760(2026-08-13取得)
  • ndl— R100000136-I1050859073008837760(2026-08-13取得)
  • openalex— W4321788251(2026-08-14取得)

引用

Tanaka, Hidekazu・Hidekazu Tanaka(2023-02-24) Against verb-stranding VP-ellipsis in Japanese: reply to Funakoshi (2016) 『Journal of East Asian Linguistics』 32(1) pp. 1-28 Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Tanaka2023AgainstVerbStranding
書誌 67,320件 語別索引 17,251件 資源 113件 研究者 303名 JSON