論文 ·対照・比較 ·未確認
Perception of English semivowels by Japanese-speaking learners of English
Wei William Zhou ・ Mineharu Nakayama ・ A. Fujimori
- 刊行年
- 2024-08-19
- 収録
- 『IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching』 63(4) pp. 2927-2952
- 出版
- De Gruyter
- 言語
- 英語
- OpenAlex
- W4401685642
- DOI
- 10.1515/iral-2023-0285
- ISSN
- 0019-042X
- URL
- https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/iral-2023-0285/pdf
要旨
Abstract This study compared the perception of English semivowels /j/ and /w/ and their corresponding vowels /i/ and /u/ by two groups of Japanese-speaking learners of English: foreign language (FL) learners in Japan and second language learners who were initially FL learners (FL-L2). The phonological targets were /i/ and /u/ with and without preceding /j/ and /w/, respectively (/ji/-/i/ and /wu/-/u/). Discrimination and identification results showed that both groups performed comparably for /i/ with and without /j/, indicating their reliance on native phonological sensitivity to /i/ and /j/, which closely resemble Japanese /i/ and /j/. However, important differences emerged for /u/ with and without /w/, possibly due to articulatory differences in lip rounding for /u/ and /w/ between the two languages. Notably, while FL-L2 learners were equally competent in both the /u/-/wu/ and the /i/-/ji/ discriminations, FL learners were much less capable of the /u/-/wu/ discrimination than of the /i/-/ji/ discrimination. Moreover, FL-L2 learners were better at identifying /u/ than their FL peers, suggesting that L2 exposure may have facilitated their acquisition of the articulatory details associated with /u/. Overall, the study showed that engaging in L2 immersion following FL learning is beneficial for non-native phonological development among adult learners.
主題
この書誌の出所
- openalex— W4401685642(2026-08-14取得)
引用
Wei William Zhou・Mineharu Nakayama・A. Fujimori(2024-08-19) Perception of English semivowels by Japanese-speaking learners of English 『IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching』 63(4) pp. 2927-2952 De Gruyter